Upload Status

 2057 Beginning of 2057  Results  12/17: 2057 Live Coaches Draft



NEWS

Instructions for the LIVE Coaches Draft Dec 17th @ 6 pm MST

0 comments


JJ Smitty
Wed Dec 11 06:28 AM

Instructions for the LIVE Coaches Draft:

Time\Date: Dec 17th @ 6 pm MST

Using TeamSpeak and Twitch.tv.

There are 3 ways you can do the draft.

1. use the draft function with in the game and export your draft preference with in game. Do a normal stage export.

2. you can send in a list of coaches you want me to draft for you

3. you can draft live, we use twitch.tv and teamspeak. Your pick will come up and you'll have a chance to draft live.

Instructions for list making;

Open the Retain Staff window and when you click on "Finished with Renegotiations" the Set Staff Draft window will appear.

This is where you will set your preferences for your coaches and the computer will draft them for you if you don't get any of the coaches on your list.

Export and then PM me your Live Draft Preference list;

Example list;

Owner - JJSmitty
Team - Omaha

Head Coach;

Going to keep him

Off Coordinator;

Name - Age - Offense
1. Johnny Rogers - 43 - West Coast
2. Tommy Thomas - 54 - Smashmouth
3. Reggie Riley - 61 - Balanced
4. Rich Rod - 34 - West Coast
5. Bill Smith - 54 - Balanced

Def Coordinator;

Name - Age - Defense

Going to keep him

and so on with the other coaches.

Also, remember to PM me your list.


***Joining the Live Draft, I'll have my Teamspeak Server up if any owner wants to join. You'll actually have the option to draft Live.. PM me if you'd like to join and I'll send you my sever IP and password.

*** I'm using Twitch.tv to stream the draft live so you can see the updated coach available in real time.


Thanks guys and lets have some fun with this.



Check in for 2057 Live Coaches Draft on Dec 17th @ 6 pm MST

6 comments


JJ Smitty
Wed Dec 04 06:50 AM

This is a check in for the 2057 Live Coaches Draft on Dec 17th @ 6 pm MST

Hope to see ya there, we usually get on about an hour early to shoot the shit.

Even if you don't have a headset, still get on the teamspeak server and there's a chat function.

If you can't connect to the chat server, update Teamspeak to the current version.

Will be there with bells on

by Ushikawa at Wed Dec 04, 2019 06:57 AM

I'll be there. It's always a good time.

by Jander3456 at Wed Dec 04, 2019 10:28 AM

I'll be there

by BGBob at Wed Dec 04, 2019 01:46 PM

In

by TurfToe at Wed Dec 04, 2019 04:06 PM

I'm planning on it

by bbriders at Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:36 PM

Unable to attend, I will send you a list within the next day or two

by mac88 at Thu Dec 12, 2019 09:42 AM



Updated all the logo's and team names in game and on website

0 comments


JJ Smitty
Sat Oct 12 11:19 AM

I've updated all the logo's and team names, to grab them just;

go to controls, then participants and click "import configuration"

You should see the New Oregon Bandits Logo ingame.

Plus, all rosters, stats and draft history have been updated on the site too.



Discussion: Putting High Rated Players on Trade Block First

6 comments


JJ Smitty
Thu Oct 10 05:23 AM

How does everyone feel about a rule where you put highly rated and high potential players on the trade block first before trading so the whole league has a shot at them.

Example would be an 80+ player or a young player with ton's of potential.

Lets Discuss;

I'll need to hear some discussion before voting, as I want to understand the genesis of this rule.

Is this so everyone has a shot to make an offer on a stud?

I've gone into trade talks about a middling player posted on the block and walked away spending multiple 1st's on a stud that wasn't even up for trade. It just happened through trade discussion. I'd hate to see that dynamic disappear due to a rule like this. I see two potential outcomes in a scenario like this due to a rule like the one proposed:

1. Just like BS interviews in the NFL to meet candidacy requirements, a player would be put on the block with no intent in doing any deal aside from the one requiring the block posting.

2. The impromptu discussion of a player that was not originally on the block gets sniped out from under the owner who piqued the interest of the selling owner.

Both of these outcomes are negatives for the buying team and will damper trading IMO. However, if the benefits outweigh the negatives, I'd be all fo rit. I just need to understand what this fixes.

by TurfToe at Thu Oct 10, 2019 07:45 AM

Yeah, the simple explanation would be Yes Turf, it would be so everyone has a shot to make an offer on a stud player(80+ rated).

This trade rule wouldn't be for Joe Blow (50 or 60 player) it's more about those elite players.

by JJ Smitty at Thu Oct 10, 2019 10:56 AM

My two cents is that there shouldn't need to be a rule about this if the owners are trying to do what's right for their own team. When it becomes a problem is if there's unfair player dumping that specifically helps another team. I have no problem if a fair price is paid in a trade without me knowing the player was available. Happens all the time in the NFL. And yes, there are trades made in the NFL that are for less value than what another team offered.......specifically if that offer came in from a division rival.

by Aamalin at Thu Oct 10, 2019 11:11 AM

I agree with Aamalin, there shouldn't need to be a rule, that's why I turned this into a discussion instead of a vote. I do think there needs to be a discussion on this topic and that's all.

by JJ Smitty at Thu Oct 10, 2019 12:57 PM

I would just echo what Aamalin said. Shouldn't need to be a rule unless there is unfair player dumping or someone trying to take advantage of a new or inexperienced owner.

I would guess too that most owners would realize that you would probably get more competitive offers by actually posting said player on the trade block rather than taking an offer that comes along.

If you wanted a rule to prevent or minimize any unfair trading I would say that the commish has final say and could veto a trade if needs be.

Or the commish could put a trade up for vote if the trade is deemed to be potentially questionable. Then the league would vote. Kind of like what most fantasy football leagues do.

by bbriders at Fri Oct 11, 2019 07:39 PM

Personally, I like the idea of targeting a team for a trade, having spent the time to determine who has what I need, so that I can fashion a trade to accomplish that. Tha trade board is fine, but I think both aspects of trading work and should be usable by all owners.

by Sverngold at Sat Oct 12, 2019 07:36 AM



Poll: Vote to change Draft time of 4th round to 1 hour

7 comments


JJ Smitty
Wed Sep 04 04:54 AM

This is a league Vote to change the 4th round of the draft to 1 hour.

If over 80% of the league votes yes, we will change it.

This will be open for 2 weeks.

I voted yes

by hbcook86 at Wed Sep 04, 2019 05:13 AM

Tucson says yes

by Sverngold at Wed Sep 04, 2019 05:56 AM

Guys, just vote. You don't need to state it in here.

by JJ Smitty at Wed Sep 04, 2019 06:09 AM

I voted, but I am not stating it here.

You're welcome Josh.

by TurfToe at Wed Sep 04, 2019 08:18 AM

Thanks Turf, I know how you love to follow the rules.

by JJ Smitty at Wed Sep 04, 2019 08:32 AM

You know I love to stir the pot when the opportunity arises.

There was no one to make quit in this year's draft so I am trying to stay busy.

The draft chat sure is less dramatic when all the new guys are cool cats.

by TurfToe at Wed Sep 04, 2019 09:13 AM

Gotta love ya bud.. :)

by JJ Smitty at Wed Sep 04, 2019 09:42 AM



2057 TRADE BLOCK
Trade Deadline is when the week 9 sim is completed

Alaska Kodiaks (Marven)
Alaska Block

New Orleans Voodoo (BGBob)
New Orleans Trade Block

Miami Talons (bbriders)
Miami Talons Block

Fargo Sodbusters (Ushikawa)
FAR early block considerations