It is currently Fri Apr 10, 2026 2:35 am

All times are UTC-07:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 399 posts ]  Go to page Previous 19 10 11 12 1316 Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:47 am 
Offline
Legend Of The Game
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 3764
Location: New Zealand
[quote7b24695="Fonzie"]I think Butler's a good choice, but are we making these selections according to our perceptions of roster needs, or by the in-game evaluation?[/quote7b24695]

We usually go with the in-game evaluation, but don't always have to.

_________________
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:51 am 
Offline
New Orleans Raging Horde
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 7:57 pm
Posts: 564
Location: New Orleans
[quotebbe428f="Fonzie"]I think Butler's a good choice, but are we making these selections according to our perceptions of roster needs, or by the in-game evaluation?[/quotebbe428f]

The in game said DE, but he already drafted one, then ILB and FB, and he has 3 ILB and 2 FB. So the answer to your questions is Perceptions. Is there a rule that we need to use the system, because I almost never agree with the system regarding my own team.

_________________
Image
2014 & 2015 CFL Champions
2007, 2014, 2015 & 2017 Conf Champs
07, 08, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 26 Division Champs


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:59 am 
Offline
Shreveport Pride
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:19 pm
Posts: 2427
Location: Shreveport Pride
[quote1bfdda8="Meatholes"][quote1bfdda8="Fonzie"]I think Butler's a good choice, but are we making these selections according to our perceptions of roster needs, or by the in-game evaluation?[/quote1bfdda8]

The in game said DE, but he already drafted one, then ILB and FB, and he has 3 ILB and 2 FB. So the answer to your questions is Perceptions. Is there a rule that we need to use the system, because I almost never agree with the system regarding my own team.[/quote1bfdda8]

Neither is really accurate to determine how you would draft if you were making the choice. We're not trying to reward people for missing their draft picks, just get a pick in that looks like it would fit their team. Best thing to do is to not miss a draft pick - setup the utility. At least then, the pick would be made from the first person on your list in the utility, even if you didn't have it on.

_________________
Image
Deep South Division Champions
2006, 2009-10, 2019, 2023-24, 2027, 2031-32, 2034-35, 2040, 2044, 2046-47, 2051-53, 2055-56, 2058-62
Eastern Conference Champions
2009, 2031, 2055
CFL Champions
2031, 2055
Hall of Fame
Joshua Mask, Douglas Hartman, Carl Bradford, Leland Wellins, Wally Wooden (#80), Brantley Gilmore (#9), Mo Kirwan, Josh Stanton, Efrain Tate


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:28 am 
Offline
Tulsa Talons
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 9:46 pm
Posts: 1693
Location: Tulsa Talons
Phillip Rasheed is another one of the LBs I was looking to get, he put up some good combine numbers and had some nice orange bars, and was very underrated by my scout- so I'm hoping he turns into something useful. I will most likely switch him over to SLB where he has more experience. I figure if I keep drafting LBs some of them have to turn into something decent. The only problem with Rasheed, and the reason I didn't take him with my first 3rd round pick is- he will have a conflict...but I can live with that if he turns into a solid player.

_________________
Image

Home of Marvin "Muddy Waters" Raffo


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:33 pm 
Offline
Detroit Vampires
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 5:34 am
Posts: 3186
Location: Detroit Vampires fan
[quote0d7cd31="Doug5984"]Phillip Rasheed is another one of the LBs I was looking to get, he put up some good combine numbers and had some nice orange bars, and was very underrated by my scout- so I'm hoping he turns into something useful. I will most likely switch him over to SLB where he has more experience. I figure if I keep drafting LBs some of them have to turn into something decent. The only problem with Rasheed, and the reason I didn't take him with my first 3rd round pick is- he will have a conflict...but I can live with that if he turns into a solid player.[/quote0d7cd31]

Damn you Doug, I was gonna pick him with the very next pick.

Oh well, I'll have to settle with a tackle that's was rated high but got left over for some reason.

_________________
Former Detroit Vampire owner Image

Great Lakes division champions -2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2025
Eastern Conference champions - 2005, 2006, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023
CFL Champions - 2021, 2023


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:54 pm 
Offline
Huntington Beach Wolfpack
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:56 pm
Posts: 1404
Location: Atlanta Wolfpack
[quote8dd4476="fantastic flying froggies"]

Oh well, I'll have to settle with a tackle that's was rated high but got left over for some reason.[/quote8dd4476]

I really like Ferreira. He'll probably be a 31/62 tackle coming out of training camp.

Rasheed will probably be a 25/56 or so. I like your tackle better. :)

_________________
GM, Atlanta Wolfpack
Formerly of the Anchorage Wolfpack and Huntington Beach Wolfpack and now back as a mediocre GM
CFL Champs - 2026, 2029


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 1:03 pm 
Offline
Tulsa Talons
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 9:46 pm
Posts: 1693
Location: Tulsa Talons
[quote10b6c1f="fantastic flying froggies"][quote10b6c1f="Doug5984"]Phillip Rasheed is another one of the LBs I was looking to get, he put up some good combine numbers and had some nice orange bars, and was very underrated by my scout- so I'm hoping he turns into something useful. I will most likely switch him over to SLB where he has more experience. I figure if I keep drafting LBs some of them have to turn into something decent. The only problem with Rasheed, and the reason I didn't take him with my first 3rd round pick is- he will have a conflict...but I can live with that if he turns into a solid player.[/quote10b6c1f]

Damn you Doug, I was gonna pick him with the very next pick.

Oh well, I'll have to settle with a tackle that's was rated high but got left over for some reason.[/quote10b6c1f]

Well that makes me feel much better about the pick...and makes me VERY happy I traded up 4 spots to grab him.

_________________
Image

Home of Marvin "Muddy Waters" Raffo


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:17 pm 
Offline
Baltimore Barbarians
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 10:55 am
Posts: 1827
Location: Baltimore
Denver's top needs are listed as ILB, RB and S. They've already drafted a S and their starting MLB has a potential of 65 according to my scout, so I think RB makes the most sense. I'll suggest either RB Randall Shapiro or RB Matthew Wright.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:54 am
Posts: 103
[quote39891d6="timmynausea"]Denver's top needs are listed as ILB, RB and S. They've already drafted a S and their starting MLB has a potential of 65 according to my scout, so I think RB makes the most sense. I'll suggest either RB Randall Shapiro or RB Matthew Wright.[/quote39891d6]

I would suggest Shapiro.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:31 pm 
Offline
Legend Of The Game
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 3764
Location: New Zealand
Shapiro it is! I'll make the pick now.

_________________
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Argonauts
Our top 2 picks this year have both been RBs. I think Dunlap has some potential based on his bars. Even though he didn't workout, I feel he will turn out to be one of the fastest backs in this draft. I also liked his intangibles as he will mesh well with our backfield leader, etc. I'm cruious to see where others had him rated however.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:19 am
Posts: 202
Location: Michigan
[quote2ad7b66="Shooter"]Our top 2 picks this year have both been RBs. I think Dunlap has some potential based on his bars. Even though he didn't workout, I feel he will turn out to be one of the fastest backs in this draft. I also liked his intangibles as he will mesh well with our backfield leader, etc. I'm cruious to see where others had him rated however.[/quote2ad7b66]

actually i think the de you grabbed Negron, could end up being the best bargain in the draft.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Argonauts
[quote07d8b49="clubber lang"][quote07d8b49="Shooter"]Our top 2 picks this year have both been RBs. I think Dunlap has some potential based on his bars. Even though he didn't workout, I feel he will turn out to be one of the fastest backs in this draft. I also liked his intangibles as he will mesh well with our backfield leader, etc. I'm cruious to see where others had him rated however.[/quote07d8b49]

actually i think the de you grabbed Negron, could end up being the best bargain in the draft.[/quote07d8b49]

Actually Negron was drafted by Arizona and he is a DT. I had him on the list as well, but figured he wasn't falling that far. As it turns out he has some good potential coming out at 27/60. Dunlap looks pretty good so far as he is starting out being listed as 45/51. I hope the later number improves in camp rather than the prior number dropping.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:19 am
Posts: 202
Location: Michigan
[quote71ffd53="Shooter"][quote71ffd53="clubber lang"][quote71ffd53="Shooter"]Our top 2 picks this year have both been RBs. I think Dunlap has some potential based on his bars. Even though he didn't workout, I feel he will turn out to be one of the fastest backs in this draft. I also liked his intangibles as he will mesh well with our backfield leader, etc. I'm cruious to see where others had him rated however.[/quote71ffd53]

actually i think the de you grabbed Negron, could end up being the best bargain in the draft.[/quote71ffd53]

Actually Negron was drafted by Arizona and he is a DT. I had him on the list as well, but figured he wasn't falling that far. As it turns out he has some good potential coming out at 27/60. Dunlap looks pretty good so far as he is starting out being listed as 45/51. I hope the later number improves in camp rather than the prior number dropping.[/quote71ffd53]

yeah your right it was arizona, my bad, every time i see your banner i think of arizona, must be because i used to play in the wigfl as the arizona scorpions,

another nice pick was made by clevelan, de Christian lester, i was trying to grab an extra 3rd to snatch him up, although he could be a colossal bust as well, but i think he was worth the shot 6-6 292, it will be interesting to see if he has a lot of blocked passes.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:50 pm 
Offline
Tucson Toros
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 2:30 pm
Posts: 4203
Location: Tucson Toros
I'm waiting to hear about a trade possibility, but will make my pick before the deadline.

_________________
Image
Ring of Fire Division Champions - 2009, 2011-2026, 2028-33
Western Conference Champions - 2011-2013, 2016, 2017, 2019-2022, 2024, 2025, 2028, 2033
CFL Champions - 2011, 2013, 2016, 2017, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2025


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:01 pm 
Offline
Huntington Beach Wolfpack
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:56 pm
Posts: 1404
Location: Atlanta Wolfpack
[quote3e7c642="clubber lang"]

another nice pick was made by clevelan, de Christian lester, i was trying to grab an extra 3rd to snatch him up, although he could be a colossal bust as well, but i think he was worth the shot 6-6 292, it will be interesting to see if he has a lot of blocked passes.[/quote3e7c642]

My scout shows him as 17/54. He could be a solid backup for Cleveland.

_________________
GM, Atlanta Wolfpack
Formerly of the Anchorage Wolfpack and Huntington Beach Wolfpack and now back as a mediocre GM
CFL Champs - 2026, 2029


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:19 am
Posts: 202
Location: Michigan
[quotecc4c001="Stretch"][quotecc4c001="clubber lang"]

another nice pick was made by clevelan, de Christian lester, i was trying to grab an extra 3rd to snatch him up, although he could be a colossal bust as well, but i think he was worth the shot 6-6 292, it will be interesting to see if he has a lot of blocked passes.[/quotecc4c001]

My scout shows him as 17/54. He could be a solid backup for Cleveland.[/quotecc4c001]

my scout stinks at DL rated poor, so i guess my guy got it right 16-54 or your guy rated excellent goofed, only time will tell, i hope your scout was right :)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:32 pm 
Offline
Santa Cruz Privateers
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:43 pm
Posts: 711
Location: Santa Cruz Privateers
My scout is Fair on the DL and he has him at 17-54 also :?

_________________
Image

San Andreas Division Champions: 2005,2007,2015,2017,2018,2019,2020,2021,2028,2032,2035

2032 Western Conference Champions

2032 CFL Champions


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:19 am
Posts: 202
Location: Michigan
[quoted53d6a0="Fastcat"]My scout is Fair on the DL and he has him at 17-54 also :?[/quoted53d6a0]

interesting, maybe we should put together a study of what different rated scouts see, just to see how important the scout really is, what really pisses me of is when my scout is rated very good in something and he still comes up with the "hard to read" quote, total b.s. what do i pay him for? i would expect an answer like that from scout rated lower at that position.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:56 pm 
Offline
Kansas City Crows

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 6:40 pm
Posts: 1481
Location: Kansas City Crows
[quotefc77bf9="clubber lang"][quotefc77bf9="Fastcat"]My scout is Fair on the DL and he has him at 17-54 also :?[/quotefc77bf9]

interesting, maybe we should put together a study of what different rated scouts see, just to see how important the scout really is, what really pisses me of is when my scout is rated very good in something and he still comes up with the "hard to read" quote, total b.s. what do i pay him for? i would expect an answer like that from scout rated lower at that position.[/quotefc77bf9]

I do wonder if getting the worst ever scout will be a better option and just go against his suggestions. TT give it a shot, I am no guinea pig here.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:58 pm 
Offline
Kansas City Crows

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 6:40 pm
Posts: 1481
Location: Kansas City Crows
dola, I see him at 17 / 54 also, but I think I know why. Now that he is on a team, yet not through camp. The only scout that sees something different the the rest of the league is Cleveland's. We all get an assement, but after camp our scouts may differ.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Argonauts
[quotee3b3bce="clubber lang"]yeah your right it was arizona, my bad, every time i see your banner i think of arizona, must be because i used to play in the wigfl as the arizona scorpions,
[/quotee3b3bce]

Arizona??? I know San Antonio hasn't been close to a great team, but we're not in the same tier as Arizona. Besides who would want to hang out with Midgets dancing on stage?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Argonauts
[quote9acfb52="Fonzie"]I'm waiting to hear about a trade possibility, but will make my pick before the deadline.[/quote9acfb52]

Tucson is getting close. Who's the next Billy Joe on the list?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:19 am
Posts: 202
Location: Michigan
[quote4d2461c="Shooter"][quote4d2461c="clubber lang"]yeah your right it was arizona, my bad, every time i see your banner i think of arizona, must be because i used to play in the wigfl as the arizona scorpions,
[/quote4d2461c]

Arizona??? I know San Antonio hasn't been close to a great team, but we're not in the same tier as Arizona. Besides who would want to hang out with Midgets dancing on stage?[/quote4d2461c]

this message brought to by the proud members of the "what the hell are you talking about, put down the crack pipe foundation" :lol:


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Argonauts
Uh...that's about the tier I was referring to for Arizona! :lol:


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 399 posts ]  Go to page Previous 19 10 11 12 1316 Next

All times are UTC-07:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited