It is currently Mon Apr 06, 2026 2:33 pm

All times are UTC-07:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 220 posts ]  Go to page Previous 13 4 5 6 79 Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 11:18 am 
Offline
Baltimore Barbarians
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 10:55 am
Posts: 1827
Location: Baltimore
Has any other league done this (have Solecismic freeze the cap)? Curious if there are any results to look at.

I was like a lot of you in that when the issue first arose, especially during the discussions in my other league, I favored freezing the cap as the simplest solution. Now that I've looked everything over a few times over the past few months, I actually think the limit on renegotiations will better address the actual problem. I suppose that's why most leagues have opted for that.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:18 pm 
Offline
Legendary Former Owner
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 11:23 am
Posts: 1574
Location: Tampa Bay Torpedos
[quote87aff9e="timmynausea"]Has any other league done this (have Solecismic freeze the cap)? Curious if there are any results to look at.[/quote87aff9e]

I have not heard of it.

Solecismic is generally very, very cautious about making any hacks to the data files like this. I'd guess that the odds of them doing it are pretty low and making any plans assuming it would happen is pretty short-sighted.

_________________
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:00 am 
Offline
Huntington Beach Wolfpack
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:56 pm
Posts: 1404
Location: Atlanta Wolfpack
[quote38dd01a="wademoore"][quote38dd01a="timmynausea"]Has any other league done this (have Solecismic freeze the cap)? Curious if there are any results to look at.[/quote38dd01a]

I have not heard of it.

Solecismic is generally very, very cautious about making any hacks to the data files like this. I'd guess that the odds of them doing it are pretty low and making any plans assuming it would happen is pretty short-sighted.[/quote38dd01a]

Then someone needs to ask if it can be done.

I just don't like the way we're currently doing it (bogus cap space).

_________________
GM, Atlanta Wolfpack
Formerly of the Anchorage Wolfpack and Huntington Beach Wolfpack and now back as a mediocre GM
CFL Champs - 2026, 2029


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 7:27 am 
Offline
Cleveland Flats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 11:54 am
Posts: 1837
bump....

Any new thoughts on this? The season is coming to a close and [ifce530a][bfce530a]if[/bfce530a][/ifce530a] we're going to take a vote on this... we should probably do it soon.

_________________
The Cleveland Flats Ring of Honor:
FB Mark Reed, WR Tony Oaks, OG Richard Johnson, DT Herb Handy, OLB Alfonso Levine, SS Elijah Roy


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 7:14 am 
Offline
Tucson Toros
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 2:30 pm
Posts: 4203
Location: Tucson Toros
I believe that the final year-renegotiation rule is going to be the most effective fix.

_________________
Image
Ring of Fire Division Champions - 2009, 2011-2026, 2028-33
Western Conference Champions - 2011-2013, 2016, 2017, 2019-2022, 2024, 2025, 2028, 2033
CFL Champions - 2011, 2013, 2016, 2017, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2025


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 7:20 am 
Offline
Detroit Vampires
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 5:34 am
Posts: 3186
Location: Detroit Vampires fan
I thought the plan was to gradually increase the out of game salary cap penalty until we can freeze the next TV contract in game.

I still don't think this is the best solution, but I thought that's what we had voted on.

Am I wrong in thinking that?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 8:01 am 
Offline
Legendary Former Owner
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 10:13 pm
Posts: 1240
Location: Baltimore Bombers
Yeah, the cap freeze is something that should be in effect already. Any eventual votes should be held if we'd want to add more rules in addition to that one.

Also, the change to the cap increase in the "global options" should be done ASAP, or at least before starting the new season, since it only has an effect when a new TV contract comes. We don't have the option to change it later and have no way of telling when it's due.

_________________
Image
Division winners in 2003, 2012, 2016, 2019
147-122-3 regular season record
3-5 playoff record


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:33 pm
Posts: 1223
Location: In Santa Cruz sitting on a beach, earning 20%
[quote98f86a9="TLK"]bump....

Any new thoughts on this? The season is coming to a close and [i98f86a9][b98f86a9]if[/b98f86a9][/i98f86a9] we're going to take a vote on this... we should probably do it soon.[/quote98f86a9]
I vote "YES" to ban all Presbyterians from this league. Good call TLK!

_________________
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 12:54 pm 
Offline
Baltimore Barbarians
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 10:55 am
Posts: 1827
Location: Baltimore
[quotecf86ba2="Fonzie"]I believe that the final year-renegotiation rule is going to be the most effective fix.[/quotecf86ba2]

Ditto.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:39 pm 
Offline
Tulsa Talons
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 9:46 pm
Posts: 1693
Location: Tulsa Talons
[quote3baeabe="timmynausea"][quote3baeabe="Fonzie"]I believe that the final year-renegotiation rule is going to be the most effective fix.[/quote3baeabe]

Ditto.[/quote3baeabe]

Ditto on this
and ditto on something needs to be done and voted on.

I have always been in favor of the final year fix, it's not perfect but seems to be the best / easiest, and we could do that, as well as freeze the cap to bring it back in check...and maybe by the time that happens Jim will have released an updated version.

The dead cap is what is in place now, and I'd vote to increase that if that is what the majority of the league wants, as I feel we need something, but I'd prefer the other way.

_________________
Image

Home of Marvin "Muddy Waters" Raffo


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:59 pm 
Offline
Las Vegas Rounders
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 9:54 pm
Posts: 4693
Location: Poplar Grove, IL
Let's choose one or the other. I'm not a big fan of implementing multiple fixes, especially if it works out, we won't know which fix is the significant factor in resolving the problem.

_________________
ROF Division Champions: 2039 - 2043, 2045, 2047, 2054, 2056 - 2060, 2063, 2066-2067, 2070-2072
WFC Conference Champions: 2018, 2041, 2042, 2057-2058, 2060, 2062-2063
CFL Champions: 2018, 2041, 2057-2058, 2060, 2062

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 6:27 am 
Offline
Shreveport Pride
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:19 pm
Posts: 2427
Location: Shreveport Pride
I like the last year renegotiation fix. The dead cap fix will be an issue when we finally do freeze the cap as it will be frozen higher than our dead cap space allows and we'll need to catch up.

The renegotiation fix makes for a smoother transition to a cap freeze at the end of a TV contract. It is also easier to obey, since I don't have to get a calculator out to figure out if I go over the dead cap limit. I just look at a guy and see if he's in his last year or not.

_________________
Image
Deep South Division Champions
2006, 2009-10, 2019, 2023-24, 2027, 2031-32, 2034-35, 2040, 2044, 2046-47, 2051-53, 2055-56, 2058-62
Eastern Conference Champions
2009, 2031, 2055
CFL Champions
2031, 2055
Hall of Fame
Joshua Mask, Douglas Hartman, Carl Bradford, Leland Wellins, Wally Wooden (#80), Brantley Gilmore (#9), Mo Kirwan, Josh Stanton, Efrain Tate


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 8:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:33 pm
Posts: 1223
Location: In Santa Cruz sitting on a beach, earning 20%
I just want to be sure I understand this last year renegotiation bit.

If a player is on the last year of a contract, we cannot renegotiate a new contract with that player. He has to become a FA unless we go ahead and franchise the player, correct?

_________________
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 9:18 am 
Offline
Baltimore Barbarians
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 10:55 am
Posts: 1827
Location: Baltimore
[quotec2c6481="Cheesehead Craig"]I just want to be sure I understand this last year renegotiation bit.

If a player is on the last year of a contract, we cannot renegotiate a new contract with that player. He has to become a FA unless we go ahead and franchise the player, correct?[/quotec2c6481]

No. You can only renegotiate with a player that is in the last year of his contract. If he has 2, 3, 4 years left on his deal, you can't renegotiate. It makes it a much tougher choice to hand out a big, long term contract when you know you won't be able to reneg. it down until the last year.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 9:23 am 
Offline
Cleveland Flats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 11:54 am
Posts: 1837
[quoteec3e2b8="timmynausea"][quoteec3e2b8="Cheesehead Craig"]I just want to be sure I understand this last year renegotiation bit.

If a player is on the last year of a contract, we cannot renegotiate a new contract with that player. He has to become a FA unless we go ahead and franchise the player, correct?[/quoteec3e2b8]

No. You can only renegotiate with a player that is in the last year of his contract. If he has 2, 3, 4 years left on his deal, you can't renegotiate. It makes it a much tougher choice to hand out a big, long term contract when you know you won't be able to reneg. it down until the last year.[/quoteec3e2b8]

I haven't followed along in other leagues. Is there an easy way to monitor this?

_________________
The Cleveland Flats Ring of Honor:
FB Mark Reed, WR Tony Oaks, OG Richard Johnson, DT Herb Handy, OLB Alfonso Levine, SS Elijah Roy


Last edited by TLK on Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:24 am 
Offline
Las Vegas Rounders
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 9:54 pm
Posts: 4693
Location: Poplar Grove, IL
So if a player gets injured or has a down year, he can't be renegotiated unless its his last year.

_________________
ROF Division Champions: 2039 - 2043, 2045, 2047, 2054, 2056 - 2060, 2063, 2066-2067, 2070-2072
WFC Conference Champions: 2018, 2041, 2042, 2057-2058, 2060, 2062-2063
CFL Champions: 2018, 2041, 2057-2058, 2060, 2062

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:36 am 
Offline
Legendary Former Owner
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 10:13 pm
Posts: 1240
Location: Baltimore Bombers
[quotebf768f0="TLK"]
I haven't followed along in other leagues. Is there an easy way to monitor this?[/quotebf768f0]

gstelmack wrote an utility which monitors this - Skydog uses it in the WOOF.

_________________
Image
Division winners in 2003, 2012, 2016, 2019
147-122-3 regular season record
3-5 playoff record


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:47 am 
Offline
Tulsa Talons
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 9:46 pm
Posts: 1693
Location: Tulsa Talons
[quoted565585="TurfToe"]So if a player gets injured or has a down year, he can't be renegotiated unless its his last year.[/quoted565585]

that is correct, what i've seen in other leagues is a no renegotiation unless its the last year, no matter what.

_________________
Image

Home of Marvin "Muddy Waters" Raffo


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:01 pm 
Offline
Kansas City Crows

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 6:40 pm
Posts: 1481
Location: Kansas City Crows
[quotefadb9db="3ric"][quotefadb9db="TLK"]
I haven't followed along in other leagues. Is there an easy way to monitor this?[/quotefadb9db]

gstelmack wrote an utility which monitors this - Skydog uses it in the WOOF.[/quotefadb9db]

What happens during holdouts?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 8:06 pm 
Offline
Tulsa Talons
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 9:46 pm
Posts: 1693
Location: Tulsa Talons
[quotedb0fc12="thater"][quotedb0fc12="3ric"][quotedb0fc12="TLK"]
I haven't followed along in other leagues. Is there an easy way to monitor this?[/quotedb0fc12]

gstelmack wrote an utility which monitors this - Skydog uses it in the WOOF.[/quotedb0fc12]

What happens during holdouts?[/quotedb0fc12]

I think holdouts should be the only exception....
And now I'm curious as well how the utility handles this, although it'd be easy to see on the player card that the hold out began, contract given, holdout ended.

_________________
Image

Home of Marvin "Muddy Waters" Raffo


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Argonauts
[quote15d044c="Doug5984"][quote15d044c="TurfToe"]So if a player gets injured or has a down year, he can't be renegotiated unless its his last year.[/quote15d044c]

that is correct, what i've seen in other leagues is a no renegotiation unless its the last year, no matter what.[/quote15d044c]

Not a fan of this rule at all for this reason alone. There have been several cases where this could come into play and it would be a valid reason to be able to renogiate the contract.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:50 pm 
Offline
Tulsa Talons
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 9:46 pm
Posts: 1693
Location: Tulsa Talons
[quote542b332="Shooter"][quote542b332="Doug5984"][quote542b332="TurfToe"]So if a player gets injured or has a down year, he can't be renegotiated unless its his last year.[/quote542b332]

that is correct, what i've seen in other leagues is a no renegotiation unless its the last year, no matter what.[/quote542b332]

Not a fan of this rule at all for this reason alone. There have been several cases where this could come into play and it would be a valid reason to be able to renogiate the contract.[/quote542b332]

but the line has to be drawn somewhere, and that makes it the easiest...if a player is hit so hard by an injury that it is not worth paying him the original contract you could always try cutting him and resigning him on the open market at a much better price.

_________________
Image

Home of Marvin "Muddy Waters" Raffo


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Argonauts
[quote4e7e532="Doug5984"][quote4e7e532="Shooter"][quote4e7e532="Doug5984"][quote4e7e532="TurfToe"]So if a player gets injured or has a down year, he can't be renegotiated unless its his last year.[/quote4e7e532]

that is correct, what i've seen in other leagues is a no renegotiation unless its the last year, no matter what.[/quote4e7e532]

Not a fan of this rule at all for this reason alone. There have been several cases where this could come into play and it would be a valid reason to be able to renogiate the contract.[/quote4e7e532]

but the line has to be drawn somewhere, and that makes it the easiest...if a player is hit so hard by an injury that it is not worth paying him the original contract you could always try cutting him and resigning him on the open market at a much better price.[/quote4e7e532]

That may not be the case, especially with aging veterans. I great example is a guy I currently have on the roster, [player]Howie Bernard[/player]. He went from an 80+ player to a 60+ player during his 6th year and after signing a new contract during his last year of his original contract. It was roughly a $100,000,000 dollar deal in total value, which I never would have paid to a 60+ player. I was able to renogiate his salary to a reasonable level after his value dropped.

Now dropping him and trying to resign him would have killed his loyalty and I would have wound up in a major bidding war to resign him. Not a risk worth taking, but in reality it was fair to renogiate his deal without trying to work the system.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 5:24 am 
Offline
Huntington Beach Wolfpack
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:56 pm
Posts: 1404
Location: Atlanta Wolfpack
The alternative to all of this finagling bullcrap is to just keep the system we have.

It works even though star players never hit free agency.

I vote we keep the current system until the TV contract comes up, then we freeze the salary cap for 5 years.

THAT will fix the problem.

_________________
GM, Atlanta Wolfpack
Formerly of the Anchorage Wolfpack and Huntington Beach Wolfpack and now back as a mediocre GM
CFL Champs - 2026, 2029


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 8:34 am 
Offline
Baltimore Barbarians
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 10:55 am
Posts: 1827
Location: Baltimore
[quote1fdd049="Stretch"]The alternative to all of this finagling bullcrap is to just keep the system we have.

It works even though star players never hit free agency.

I vote we keep the current system until the TV contract comes up, then we freeze the salary cap for 5 years.

THAT will fix the problem.[/quote1fdd049]

It's debatable that it will fix it. It'd be better than nothing, of course. Again, the problem with the game is the renegotiation code is too soft. That is what leads to the cap problems. So adjusting the cap would actually have less of an effect on the root problem than addressing renegotiations.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 220 posts ]  Go to page Previous 13 4 5 6 79 Next

All times are UTC-07:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited