Dola
Didnt mean to break up the discussion and talk about the draft
http://www.thecfl.us/forum/ |
|
| 2014 Draft Discussio http://www.thecfl.us/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3631 |
Page 10 of 16 |
| Author: | Fonzie [ Mon Jul 09, 2007 7:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote4fee520="dberner30"][quote4fee520="Doug5984"][quote4fee520="Taco"]Chicago has 2 players loaded in their utility, so when their time runs out the 1st player from their list will be selected for them. Doug, if you want to do that for me that would be great![/quote4fee520] Will do.[/quote4fee520] sorry...had an internet out and the cable guy didnt get here until a a couple hours ago...took a little time to get me back on line...[/quote4fee520] All those ellipses...are you by chance suggesting that we should read between the lines regarding your "delay" with the cable man? |
|
| Author: | dberner30 [ Mon Jul 09, 2007 7:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote83cc938="Fonzie"][quote83cc938="dberner30"][quote83cc938="Doug5984"][quote83cc938="Taco"]Chicago has 2 players loaded in their utility, so when their time runs out the 1st player from their list will be selected for them. Doug, if you want to do that for me that would be great![/quote83cc938] Will do.[/quote83cc938] sorry...had an internet out and the cable guy didnt get here until a a couple hours ago...took a little time to get me back on line...[/quote83cc938] All those ellipses...are you by chance suggesting that we should read between the lines regarding your "delay" with the cable man?[/quote83cc938] lol...i just like using them on the forum... but you are right about what they are for.... It will be a cold day . . . before I do the cable guy. |
|
| Author: | TurfToe [ Mon Jul 09, 2007 9:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote7b566b6="dberner30"][quote7b566b6="Fonzie"][quote7b566b6="dberner30"][quote7b566b6="Doug5984"][quote7b566b6="Taco"]Chicago has 2 players loaded in their utility, so when their time runs out the 1st player from their list will be selected for them. Doug, if you want to do that for me that would be great![/quote7b566b6] Will do.[/quote7b566b6] sorry...had an internet out and the cable guy didnt get here until a a couple hours ago...took a little time to get me back on line...[/quote7b566b6] All those ellipses...are you by chance suggesting that we should read between the lines regarding your "delay" with the cable man?[/quote7b566b6] lol...i just like using them on the forum... but you are right about what they are for.... It will be a cold day . . . before I do the cable guy.[/quote7b566b6] It will be a cold day...before I give up my beloved...ellipses. |
|
| Author: | MrBug708 [ Mon Jul 09, 2007 9:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I actually got the two guys I was hoping would fall to me in the second and third round |
|
| Author: | MrBug708 [ Mon Jul 09, 2007 9:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dola Didnt mean to break up the discussion and talk about the draft
|
|
| Author: | JeeberD [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote405f2a3="JeeberD"]Osborne could be a huge stud, or he could bust on me. DE is a major need for us, so I'm taking that risk...[/quote405f2a3] It's still early, but it looks like the risk paid off big time for me! |
|
| Author: | JJ Smitty [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I know it's a reach in the 3rd round but my scout just loved WR C.Downs.. I hope he's right.. |
|
| Author: | JJ Smitty [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dola, has L.B. been around for the draft this year or has all of his picks been auto..?? |
|
| Author: | Raven Hawk [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 8:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quotea4df2e6="JJ Smitty"]I know it's a reach in the 3rd round but my scout just loved WR C.Downs.. I hope he's right..[/quotea4df2e6] My scout loved him, too. I was hoping he'd slide into the 5th round, though.
|
|
| Author: | Doug5984 [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 8:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote671079f="JJ Smitty"]Dola, has L.B. been around for the draft this year or has all of his picks been auto..??[/quote671079f] We had to pick for Long Beach last round, but he has made all his other picks- if his time runs out this round then for the rest of the draft Long Beach's time will be set to 0, per the constitution...but LB still has a couple hours. |
|
| Author: | Raven Hawk [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 8:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I decided to go ahead and take MLB Donald Burnett because there was a run on OLB's, but there still seemed to be a decent MLB on the board. My scout really liked him. I probably could have gotten him in the 4th, but I don't have a 4th, so I'm happy taking him here. |
|
| Author: | Meatholes [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 8:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote6651669="Raven Hawk"]I decided to go ahead and take MLB Donald Burnett because there was a run on OLB's, but there still seemed to be a decent MLB on the board. My scout really liked him. I probably could have gotten him in the 4th, but I don't have a 4th, so I'm happy taking him here.[/quote6651669] I did not scout him, but I liked him also. He is solid in most areas and is a hard hitter which I liked. |
|
| Author: | JJ Smitty [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 8:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote6f6ccdb="Raven Hawk"][quote6f6ccdb="JJ Smitty"]I know it's a reach in the 3rd round but my scout just loved WR C.Downs.. I hope he's right..[/quote6f6ccdb] My scout loved him, too. I was hoping he'd slide into the 5th round, though. [/quote6f6ccdb]Yeah my scout had him at "Very Underrated" and we needed WR's this year so I hope he can produce after TC. |
|
| Author: | dberner30 [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 9:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quotee81b121="Meatholes"][quotee81b121="Raven Hawk"]I decided to go ahead and take MLB Donald Burnett because there was a run on OLB's, but there still seemed to be a decent MLB on the board. My scout really liked him. I probably could have gotten him in the 4th, but I don't have a 4th, so I'm happy taking him here.[/quotee81b121] I did not scout him, but I liked him also. He is solid in most areas and is a hard hitter which I liked.[/quotee81b121] my scout liked him as well..... |
|
| Author: | wademoore [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote66ca9da="Raven Hawk"]I decided to go ahead and take MLB Donald Burnett because there was a run on OLB's, but there still seemed to be a decent MLB on the board. My scout really liked him. I probably could have gotten him in the 4th, but I don't have a 4th, so I'm happy taking him here.[/quote66ca9da] I actually got pretty oconfused when glancing at the draft board... I had Armstrong at the top of my list and Burnett #2, so it took a second to figure out which one I got 
|
|
| Author: | Taco [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Long Beach is almost out of time. I don't have game access right now... Can someone post a suggested pick or two? Once there is a consensus I'll make the selection. |
|
| Author: | Raven Hawk [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I don't have the application in front of me, but based on headcount from the HTML export, it looks like DT or CB would be logical choices. |
|
| Author: | timmynausea [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quoted54a351="Raven Hawk"]I don't have the application in front of me, but based on headcount from the HTML export, it looks like DT or CB would be logical choices.[/quoted54a351] Yep. L.B. only has 2 DTs so I'll suggest DT Kurt Butler. |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
In-game needs are DE, ILB and FB. |
|
| Author: | Meatholes [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote1663c7c="Taco"]Long Beach is almost out of time. I don't have game access right now... Can someone post a suggested pick or two? Once there is a consensus I'll make the selection.[/quote1663c7c] I would say Safety and DT are the biggest needs. I am not excited about the top rated players avaialable at either position though. Do we typically make suggestions beyond the top rated players? |
|
| Author: | Taco [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Typically we just select the top rated player at a position of need. |
|
| Author: | Taco [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote89c1402="timmynausea"]Yep. L.B. only has 2 DTs so I'll suggest DT Kurt Butler.[/quote89c1402] Any other opinions about DT Kurt Butler? |
|
| Author: | Meatholes [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote9d6f124="Taco"]Typically we just select the top rated player at a position of need.[/quote9d6f124] DT Kurt Butler has good speed and agility for his size and is good on run D and Pass Tech. |
|
| Author: | Taco [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote3d7707f="Meatholes"][quote3d7707f="Taco"]Typically we just select the top rated player at a position of need.[/quote3d7707f] DT Kurt Butler has good speed and agility for his size and is good on run D and Pass Tech.[/quote3d7707f] Kurt Butler it is then. I'll make the selection and later tonight I'll load Long Beach's utility with several "Best Available" selections and turn it on. Daedalus, you can change these selections but your utility must remain on and loaded for the remainder of the draft. |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think Butler's a good choice, but are we making these selections according to our perceptions of roster needs, or by the in-game evaluation? |
|
| Page 10 of 16 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|