http://www.thecfl.us/forum/

Possible contract ru
http://www.thecfl.us/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3607
Page 2 of 2

Author:  Cheesehead Craig [ Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:44 am ]
Post subject: 

[quote0182a7d="Stretch"][quote0182a7d="Cheesehead Craig"][quote0182a7d="timmynausea"]I'm disappointed that there isn't more of a concensus. I've seen the NAFL rule in action, and it really works.[/quote0182a7d]
I think this is indictative of how divisive this issue has become. There's been more heated discussion over this than any other issue I've seen.[/quote0182a7d]

It's not divisive and I'm not over emotional! You're a big doodoo head whose big ugly face stinks of skunk! ;)

Okay, seriously now, the way the A.I. signs contracts is fundamentally broken. I think some rule needs to be put in place, whether it's the NAFL rule or the 1-year rule.

Either one works for me.[/quote0182a7d]
You accidentally replied to me instead of TT, just wanted to point that out, you son of a warthog.

Frankly, either remedy works for me too. I'm just done with the issue.

Author:  wademoore [ Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:52 am ]
Post subject: 

[quotea9b9100="timmynausea"]I'm disappointed that there isn't more of a concensus. I've seen the NAFL rule in action, and it really works.[/quotea9b9100]

I think there is a consensus - we want a rule stopping these contracts.

This poll merely asked which method folks would prefer... I'd vote for the NAFL rule before I voted for no change for sure, it's just not my preference.

Author:  Fastcat [ Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:08 am ]
Post subject: 

So with the vote results, the majority by a wide margin(even with some votes still out there) desire a rule be put in place. I suggest we now refine the two above rules and put it back up for a vote with only these two options.

Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC-07:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/