http://www.thecfl.us/forum/ |
|
| Possible contract ru http://www.thecfl.us/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3607 |
Page 2 of 2 |
| Author: | Cheesehead Craig [ Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote0182a7d="Stretch"][quote0182a7d="Cheesehead Craig"][quote0182a7d="timmynausea"]I'm disappointed that there isn't more of a concensus. I've seen the NAFL rule in action, and it really works.[/quote0182a7d] I think this is indictative of how divisive this issue has become. There's been more heated discussion over this than any other issue I've seen.[/quote0182a7d] It's not divisive and I'm not over emotional! You're a big doodoo head whose big ugly face stinks of skunk! Okay, seriously now, the way the A.I. signs contracts is fundamentally broken. I think some rule needs to be put in place, whether it's the NAFL rule or the 1-year rule. Either one works for me.[/quote0182a7d] You accidentally replied to me instead of TT, just wanted to point that out, you son of a warthog. Frankly, either remedy works for me too. I'm just done with the issue. |
|
| Author: | wademoore [ Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quotea9b9100="timmynausea"]I'm disappointed that there isn't more of a concensus. I've seen the NAFL rule in action, and it really works.[/quotea9b9100] I think there is a consensus - we want a rule stopping these contracts. This poll merely asked which method folks would prefer... I'd vote for the NAFL rule before I voted for no change for sure, it's just not my preference. |
|
| Author: | Fastcat [ Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
So with the vote results, the majority by a wide margin(even with some votes still out there) desire a rule be put in place. I suggest we now refine the two above rules and put it back up for a vote with only these two options. |
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|