http://www.thecfl.us/forum/ |
|
| 2014 Draft Discussio http://www.thecfl.us/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3631 |
Page 11 of 16 |
| Author: | Taco [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote7b24695="Fonzie"]I think Butler's a good choice, but are we making these selections according to our perceptions of roster needs, or by the in-game evaluation?[/quote7b24695] We usually go with the in-game evaluation, but don't always have to. |
|
| Author: | Meatholes [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quotebbe428f="Fonzie"]I think Butler's a good choice, but are we making these selections according to our perceptions of roster needs, or by the in-game evaluation?[/quotebbe428f] The in game said DE, but he already drafted one, then ILB and FB, and he has 3 ILB and 2 FB. So the answer to your questions is Perceptions. Is there a rule that we need to use the system, because I almost never agree with the system regarding my own team. |
|
| Author: | Raven Hawk [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote1bfdda8="Meatholes"][quote1bfdda8="Fonzie"]I think Butler's a good choice, but are we making these selections according to our perceptions of roster needs, or by the in-game evaluation?[/quote1bfdda8] The in game said DE, but he already drafted one, then ILB and FB, and he has 3 ILB and 2 FB. So the answer to your questions is Perceptions. Is there a rule that we need to use the system, because I almost never agree with the system regarding my own team.[/quote1bfdda8] Neither is really accurate to determine how you would draft if you were making the choice. We're not trying to reward people for missing their draft picks, just get a pick in that looks like it would fit their team. Best thing to do is to not miss a draft pick - setup the utility. At least then, the pick would be made from the first person on your list in the utility, even if you didn't have it on. |
|
| Author: | Doug5984 [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Phillip Rasheed is another one of the LBs I was looking to get, he put up some good combine numbers and had some nice orange bars, and was very underrated by my scout- so I'm hoping he turns into something useful. I will most likely switch him over to SLB where he has more experience. I figure if I keep drafting LBs some of them have to turn into something decent. The only problem with Rasheed, and the reason I didn't take him with my first 3rd round pick is- he will have a conflict...but I can live with that if he turns into a solid player. |
|
| Author: | fantastic flying froggies [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote0d7cd31="Doug5984"]Phillip Rasheed is another one of the LBs I was looking to get, he put up some good combine numbers and had some nice orange bars, and was very underrated by my scout- so I'm hoping he turns into something useful. I will most likely switch him over to SLB where he has more experience. I figure if I keep drafting LBs some of them have to turn into something decent. The only problem with Rasheed, and the reason I didn't take him with my first 3rd round pick is- he will have a conflict...but I can live with that if he turns into a solid player.[/quote0d7cd31] Damn you Doug, I was gonna pick him with the very next pick. Oh well, I'll have to settle with a tackle that's was rated high but got left over for some reason. |
|
| Author: | Stretch [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote8dd4476="fantastic flying froggies"] Oh well, I'll have to settle with a tackle that's was rated high but got left over for some reason.[/quote8dd4476] I really like Ferreira. He'll probably be a 31/62 tackle coming out of training camp. Rasheed will probably be a 25/56 or so. I like your tackle better. 
|
|
| Author: | Doug5984 [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 1:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote10b6c1f="fantastic flying froggies"][quote10b6c1f="Doug5984"]Phillip Rasheed is another one of the LBs I was looking to get, he put up some good combine numbers and had some nice orange bars, and was very underrated by my scout- so I'm hoping he turns into something useful. I will most likely switch him over to SLB where he has more experience. I figure if I keep drafting LBs some of them have to turn into something decent. The only problem with Rasheed, and the reason I didn't take him with my first 3rd round pick is- he will have a conflict...but I can live with that if he turns into a solid player.[/quote10b6c1f] Damn you Doug, I was gonna pick him with the very next pick. Oh well, I'll have to settle with a tackle that's was rated high but got left over for some reason.[/quote10b6c1f] Well that makes me feel much better about the pick...and makes me VERY happy I traded up 4 spots to grab him. |
|
| Author: | timmynausea [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Denver's top needs are listed as ILB, RB and S. They've already drafted a S and their starting MLB has a potential of 65 according to my scout, so I think RB makes the most sense. I'll suggest either RB Randall Shapiro or RB Matthew Wright. |
|
| Author: | Victorious [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote39891d6="timmynausea"]Denver's top needs are listed as ILB, RB and S. They've already drafted a S and their starting MLB has a potential of 65 according to my scout, so I think RB makes the most sense. I'll suggest either RB Randall Shapiro or RB Matthew Wright.[/quote39891d6] I would suggest Shapiro. |
|
| Author: | Taco [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Shapiro it is! I'll make the pick now. |
|
| Author: | Shooter [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Our top 2 picks this year have both been RBs. I think Dunlap has some potential based on his bars. Even though he didn't workout, I feel he will turn out to be one of the fastest backs in this draft. I also liked his intangibles as he will mesh well with our backfield leader, etc. I'm cruious to see where others had him rated however. |
|
| Author: | nikkelbak [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote2ad7b66="Shooter"]Our top 2 picks this year have both been RBs. I think Dunlap has some potential based on his bars. Even though he didn't workout, I feel he will turn out to be one of the fastest backs in this draft. I also liked his intangibles as he will mesh well with our backfield leader, etc. I'm cruious to see where others had him rated however.[/quote2ad7b66] actually i think the de you grabbed Negron, could end up being the best bargain in the draft. |
|
| Author: | Shooter [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote07d8b49="clubber lang"][quote07d8b49="Shooter"]Our top 2 picks this year have both been RBs. I think Dunlap has some potential based on his bars. Even though he didn't workout, I feel he will turn out to be one of the fastest backs in this draft. I also liked his intangibles as he will mesh well with our backfield leader, etc. I'm cruious to see where others had him rated however.[/quote07d8b49] actually i think the de you grabbed Negron, could end up being the best bargain in the draft.[/quote07d8b49] Actually Negron was drafted by Arizona and he is a DT. I had him on the list as well, but figured he wasn't falling that far. As it turns out he has some good potential coming out at 27/60. Dunlap looks pretty good so far as he is starting out being listed as 45/51. I hope the later number improves in camp rather than the prior number dropping. |
|
| Author: | nikkelbak [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote71ffd53="Shooter"][quote71ffd53="clubber lang"][quote71ffd53="Shooter"]Our top 2 picks this year have both been RBs. I think Dunlap has some potential based on his bars. Even though he didn't workout, I feel he will turn out to be one of the fastest backs in this draft. I also liked his intangibles as he will mesh well with our backfield leader, etc. I'm cruious to see where others had him rated however.[/quote71ffd53] actually i think the de you grabbed Negron, could end up being the best bargain in the draft.[/quote71ffd53] Actually Negron was drafted by Arizona and he is a DT. I had him on the list as well, but figured he wasn't falling that far. As it turns out he has some good potential coming out at 27/60. Dunlap looks pretty good so far as he is starting out being listed as 45/51. I hope the later number improves in camp rather than the prior number dropping.[/quote71ffd53] yeah your right it was arizona, my bad, every time i see your banner i think of arizona, must be because i used to play in the wigfl as the arizona scorpions, another nice pick was made by clevelan, de Christian lester, i was trying to grab an extra 3rd to snatch him up, although he could be a colossal bust as well, but i think he was worth the shot 6-6 292, it will be interesting to see if he has a lot of blocked passes. |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm waiting to hear about a trade possibility, but will make my pick before the deadline. |
|
| Author: | Stretch [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote3e7c642="clubber lang"] another nice pick was made by clevelan, de Christian lester, i was trying to grab an extra 3rd to snatch him up, although he could be a colossal bust as well, but i think he was worth the shot 6-6 292, it will be interesting to see if he has a lot of blocked passes.[/quote3e7c642] My scout shows him as 17/54. He could be a solid backup for Cleveland. |
|
| Author: | nikkelbak [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quotecc4c001="Stretch"][quotecc4c001="clubber lang"] another nice pick was made by clevelan, de Christian lester, i was trying to grab an extra 3rd to snatch him up, although he could be a colossal bust as well, but i think he was worth the shot 6-6 292, it will be interesting to see if he has a lot of blocked passes.[/quotecc4c001] My scout shows him as 17/54. He could be a solid backup for Cleveland.[/quotecc4c001] my scout stinks at DL rated poor, so i guess my guy got it right 16-54 or your guy rated excellent goofed, only time will tell, i hope your scout was right
|
|
| Author: | Fastcat [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
My scout is Fair on the DL and he has him at 17-54 also 
|
|
| Author: | nikkelbak [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quoted53d6a0="Fastcat"]My scout is Fair on the DL and he has him at 17-54 also [/quoted53d6a0]interesting, maybe we should put together a study of what different rated scouts see, just to see how important the scout really is, what really pisses me of is when my scout is rated very good in something and he still comes up with the "hard to read" quote, total b.s. what do i pay him for? i would expect an answer like that from scout rated lower at that position. |
|
| Author: | thater [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quotefc77bf9="clubber lang"][quotefc77bf9="Fastcat"]My scout is Fair on the DL and he has him at 17-54 also [/quotefc77bf9]interesting, maybe we should put together a study of what different rated scouts see, just to see how important the scout really is, what really pisses me of is when my scout is rated very good in something and he still comes up with the "hard to read" quote, total b.s. what do i pay him for? i would expect an answer like that from scout rated lower at that position.[/quotefc77bf9] I do wonder if getting the worst ever scout will be a better option and just go against his suggestions. TT give it a shot, I am no guinea pig here. |
|
| Author: | thater [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
dola, I see him at 17 / 54 also, but I think I know why. Now that he is on a team, yet not through camp. The only scout that sees something different the the rest of the league is Cleveland's. We all get an assement, but after camp our scouts may differ. |
|
| Author: | Shooter [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quotee3b3bce="clubber lang"]yeah your right it was arizona, my bad, every time i see your banner i think of arizona, must be because i used to play in the wigfl as the arizona scorpions, [/quotee3b3bce] Arizona??? I know San Antonio hasn't been close to a great team, but we're not in the same tier as Arizona. Besides who would want to hang out with Midgets dancing on stage? |
|
| Author: | Shooter [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote9acfb52="Fonzie"]I'm waiting to hear about a trade possibility, but will make my pick before the deadline.[/quote9acfb52] Tucson is getting close. Who's the next Billy Joe on the list? |
|
| Author: | nikkelbak [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote4d2461c="Shooter"][quote4d2461c="clubber lang"]yeah your right it was arizona, my bad, every time i see your banner i think of arizona, must be because i used to play in the wigfl as the arizona scorpions, [/quote4d2461c] Arizona??? I know San Antonio hasn't been close to a great team, but we're not in the same tier as Arizona. Besides who would want to hang out with Midgets dancing on stage?[/quote4d2461c] this message brought to by the proud members of the "what the hell are you talking about, put down the crack pipe foundation" 
|
|
| Author: | Shooter [ Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Uh...that's about the tier I was referring to for Arizona!
|
|
| Page 11 of 16 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|