[quote34d54a3="MC"]#2[/quote34d54a3]
It took you two edits to get that right?
http://www.thecfl.us/forum/ |
|
| CFL Logo http://www.thecfl.us/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1233 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Grid Iron [ Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | CFL Logo |
[b8429cbe][size=188429cbe]Pick your favorite logo![/size8429cbe][/b8429cbe] Well, I whipped up some possible logos for the CFL. What do y'all think? #1: [img8429cbe]http://fof2forever.com/CFL/logo1.jpg[/img8429cbe] #2: [img8429cbe]http://fof2forever.com/CFL/logo2.jpg[/img8429cbe] #3: [img8429cbe]http://fof2forever.com/CFL/logo3.jpg[/img8429cbe] |
|
| Author: | thater [ Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
1, hands down |
|
| Author: | Doug5984 [ Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i'd say # 1 also |
|
| Author: | JeeberD [ Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I like numero uno as well... |
|
| Author: | Shooter [ Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
#1 is the best. |
|
| Author: | MC [ Thu Apr 14, 2005 10:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
#2 |
|
| Author: | 3ric [ Fri Apr 15, 2005 12:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yep, no.1 is no.1... |
|
| Author: | daedalus [ Fri Apr 15, 2005 12:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
^^^ What they said. |
|
| Author: | wademoore [ Fri Apr 15, 2005 4:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Wow... I TOTALLY disagree... To me a team logo should not have such a detailed image, it should be solid colors and have little detail... To me, #2 is by far the best... |
|
| Author: | FrogMan [ Fri Apr 15, 2005 5:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quoteeaf0a1a="wademoore"]Wow... I TOTALLY disagree... To me a team logo should not have such a detailed image, it should be solid colors and have little detail... To me, #2 is by far the best...[/quoteeaf0a1a] That's how I see it too. While #1 is very nice with neat colors and all, in my view a logo usually has solid colors. That's why I pick #2 also. FM |
|
| Author: | fantastic flying froggies [ Fri Apr 15, 2005 5:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'll be original and go with #3... (or if you have other ideas, keep them coming!) |
|
| Author: | TurfToe [ Fri Apr 15, 2005 6:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I agree with the disagreers. #1 looks great, but it's too detailed for a logo. #2 gets my vote. |
|
| Author: | Raven Hawk [ Fri Apr 15, 2005 6:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Who does #2 work for!?! Us. That's my vote. |
|
| Author: | JJ Smitty [ Fri Apr 15, 2005 7:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
TWO.... |
|
| Author: | JeeberD [ Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote34d54a3="MC"]#2[/quote34d54a3] It took you two edits to get that right?
|
|
| Author: | timmynausea [ Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
#2 |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Fri Apr 15, 2005 11:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm a #2 kinda guy. |
|
| Author: | Grid Iron [ Fri Apr 15, 2005 1:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
OK, here is the final version: [img17c43ae]http://fof2forever.com/CFL/cfllogo.jpg[/img17c43ae] Just a few more weeks until I unveil my diabolical plan. . . |
|
| Author: | General Mike [ Fri Apr 15, 2005 1:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'll say #3, but I like them all. |
|
| Author: | fantastic flying froggies [ Fri Apr 15, 2005 2:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote669d7c3="General Mike"]I'll say #3, but I like them all.[/quote669d7c3] Must be a Giants fan thing then, GM. 
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|
