[quoteef616f2="TLK"]Do we actually know who voted? Couldn't anyone who was registered have voted?[/quoteef616f2]
Yes, this is why I take PM votes for the Hall of Legends . . .
Hint. Hint. Get your votes in.
http://www.thecfl.us/forum/ |
|
| Constitutional Ammen http://www.thecfl.us/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3621 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Doug5984 [ Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Constitutional Ammen |
To be added to the League Rules Section: G. Free Agency Any free agent asking for 3 or more years MUST be offered a contract for at least 3 years for the duration of the first (pre-draft) 12 stage free agency period. In the second (post-draft) free agency period, any contract may be offered. Any GM violating this rule will have the player immediately cut (thus penalizing with bonus payment) and will also lose a draft pick at the Commissioner's discretion. |
|
| Author: | dberner30 [ Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i would assume this is effective next offseason and not this one...just thought it a good idea to have that clarified now. dont know that it makes much difference considering the players out there but you never know. |
|
| Author: | Doug5984 [ Thu Jun 28, 2007 10:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote336ae99="dberner30"]i would assume this is effective next offseason and not this one...just thought it a good idea to have that clarified now. dont know that it makes much difference considering the players out there but you never know.[/quote336ae99] I'm not sure it matters at this point all the good players asking for big deals are gone, or at least will be by the time it gets enough votes- but i thought it would be effective immediately, we'll have to check with Taco on that one. |
|
| Author: | Taco [ Fri Jun 29, 2007 3:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
This won't be effective until next offseason. I don't think it's fair to change the rules in the middle of free agency. As has been mentioned, it probably wouldn't change anything right now anyway. |
|
| Author: | fantastic flying froggies [ Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I don't like this rule, I feel it removes too much flexibity. |
|
| Author: | TLK [ Fri Jun 29, 2007 3:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
So just to clarify... my contract to [player]Marcos Garcia[/player] would have been fine under this rule? |
|
| Author: | timmynausea [ Fri Jun 29, 2007 3:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote95e2211="TLK"]So just to clarify... my contract to [player]Marcos Garcia[/player] would have been fine under this rule?[/quote95e2211] Yes. He was asking for a 2 year deal, so the rule wouldn't apply to him. |
|
| Author: | Doug5984 [ Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
22 votes, so 10 owners did not vote yet. Try to get those votes in so we can either pass it- or work on something else. |
|
| Author: | TLK [ Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Do we actually know who voted? Couldn't anyone who was registered have voted? |
|
| Author: | Doug5984 [ Sun Jul 01, 2007 11:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote62e3f6f="TLK"]Do we actually know who voted? Couldn't anyone who was registered have voted?[/quote62e3f6f] that is a good question- i don't know if it is something Taco can check in the administrative panel. |
|
| Author: | timmynausea [ Sun Jul 01, 2007 11:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote9aa394c="Doug5984"]22 votes, so 10 owners did not vote yet. Try to get those votes in so we can either pass it- or work on something else.[/quote9aa394c] I think it only takes a majority to pass, so with 18 votes we've already got that. Of course, as TLK has pointed out, we don't know for certain that all of the votes are legit. |
|
| Author: | Raven Hawk [ Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quoteef616f2="TLK"]Do we actually know who voted? Couldn't anyone who was registered have voted?[/quoteef616f2] Yes, this is why I take PM votes for the Hall of Legends . . . Hint. Hint. Get your votes in.
|
|
| Author: | 3ric [ Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
A separate "polls" forum available only to current owners would ensure the necessary exclusivity. (pause for effect) Effing elitists! |
|
| Author: | TLK [ Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote29a3d8d="3ric"]A separate "polls" forum available only to current owners would ensure the necessary exclusivity. (pause for effect) Effing elitists![/quote29a3d8d] Read my mind.... This is completed and should be available to all owners. It is listed on the Forum Index under League Business. If anyone does not see the "Owners Lounge", let me know. |
|
| Author: | fantastic flying froggies [ Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hey, that's a good idea! Since I don't like this rule, I'm gonna log in as different people and stuff the ballot. Now, why didn't I think of that before? 
|
|
| Author: | Doug5984 [ Sun Jul 08, 2007 9:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ok, so it looks like 19-5 might be the final total. Does this go into effect now? |
|
| Author: | Taco [ Sun Jul 08, 2007 9:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yep, thanks for reminding me. I have updated the constitution with this new rule: http://www.thecfl.net/constitution.html |
|
| Author: | Doug5984 [ Sun Jul 08, 2007 10:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quoted50400c="Taco"]Yep, thanks for reminding me. I have updated the constitution with this new rule: http://www.thecfl.net/constitution.html[/quoted50400c] Ok sounds good- I unstickied the thread as well. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|