http://www.thecfl.us/forum/ |
|
| Vote for Combine Accuracy for 2045 and beyond http://www.thecfl.us/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8408 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | JJ Smitty [ Tue Jan 12, 2016 7:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Vote for Combine Accuracy for 2045 and beyond |
Please vote. Here is a discussion on FOFC about the 39 setting. http://www.operationsports.com/fofc/sho ... hp?t=91136 I voted for 39 |
|
| Author: | Argot [ Tue Jan 12, 2016 8:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vote for Combine Accuracy for 2045 and beyond |
Interesting. I wonder if there will be more thought given to not giving away a monster veteran for a draft pick as that draft pick is so volatile. |
|
| Author: | Rip Murdock [ Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vote for Combine Accuracy for 2045 and beyond |
I've been through several "39" drafts and it provides new twists and turns to the process. So far I like it. Only time will tell, but 39 seems to even the field a bit for GMs who are not as experienced with the stat side of the draft. I think it also helps teams with good scouting. |
|
| Author: | Hinch [ Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vote for Combine Accuracy for 2045 and beyond |
Considering how I did in this year's draft, I voted for 39. |
|
| Author: | TurfToe [ Thu Jan 14, 2016 9:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vote for Combine Accuracy for 2045 and beyond |
Now that I finally figured out how to draft, let's change things up. I voted 39 and will go back to drafting based on cool or strange name only. |
|
| Author: | Vitostallion [ Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vote for Combine Accuracy for 2045 and beyond |
I vote for 39 |
|
| Author: | rbeyer [ Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vote for Combine Accuracy for 2045 and beyond |
Another vote for 39 |
|
| Author: | Rawrster [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 4:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vote for Combine Accuracy for 2045 and beyond |
I voted to stick at 51. I did a few 39 drafts when I was playing over at GML and there is no worse feeling than when the extremely safe looking Top 5 pick comes in to camp rated at a 30, especially when you are trying to rebuild a team and need those solid early round picks. |
|
| Author: | TurfToe [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 2:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vote for Combine Accuracy for 2045 and beyond |
Quote: I voted to stick at 51. I did a few 39 drafts when I was playing over at GML and there is no worse feeling than when the extremely safe looking Top 5 pick comes in to camp rated at a 30, especially when you are trying to rebuild a team and need those solid early round picks.
Good perspective for those who may have inherited a team and have no control over where they are picking.My plan is to still still be picking 16-32 even when I have an off year, so I never considered lottery pick risk. That being said, that's a down side to sucking. |
|
| Author: | JJ Smitty [ Tue Mar 15, 2016 6:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vote for Combine Accuracy for 2045 and beyond |
We stayed at 51 but since it was so close we will revisit it next season and have another vote. We usually change a rule with 60% or more votes for. |
|
| Author: | FlexD [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vote for Combine Accuracy for 2045 and beyond |
That sounds good, 51 sounds good to me.... |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|