It is currently Sun Apr 05, 2026 8:46 am

All times are UTC-07:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

Which of these would you prefer?
1) The NAFL Type rule- a player asking for 3 years, must be offered atleast 3 years until stage 8 of FA? 46%  46%  [ 12 ]
2) A rule allowing 1 year deals, but limiting the amount of bonus money 42%  42%  [ 11 ]
3) Other- please say below 4%  4%  [ 1 ]
4) No rule needed 8%  8%  [ 2 ]
Total votes: 26
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:33 pm
Posts: 1223
Location: In Santa Cruz sitting on a beach, earning 20%
[quote0182a7d="Stretch"][quote0182a7d="Cheesehead Craig"][quote0182a7d="timmynausea"]I'm disappointed that there isn't more of a concensus. I've seen the NAFL rule in action, and it really works.[/quote0182a7d]
I think this is indictative of how divisive this issue has become. There's been more heated discussion over this than any other issue I've seen.[/quote0182a7d]

It's not divisive and I'm not over emotional! You're a big doodoo head whose big ugly face stinks of skunk! ;)

Okay, seriously now, the way the A.I. signs contracts is fundamentally broken. I think some rule needs to be put in place, whether it's the NAFL rule or the 1-year rule.

Either one works for me.[/quote0182a7d]
You accidentally replied to me instead of TT, just wanted to point that out, you son of a warthog.

Frankly, either remedy works for me too. I'm just done with the issue.

_________________
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:52 am 
Offline
Legendary Former Owner
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 11:23 am
Posts: 1574
Location: Tampa Bay Torpedos
[quotea9b9100="timmynausea"]I'm disappointed that there isn't more of a concensus. I've seen the NAFL rule in action, and it really works.[/quotea9b9100]

I think there is a consensus - we want a rule stopping these contracts.

This poll merely asked which method folks would prefer... I'd vote for the NAFL rule before I voted for no change for sure, it's just not my preference.

_________________
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:08 am 
Offline
Santa Cruz Privateers
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:43 pm
Posts: 711
Location: Santa Cruz Privateers
So with the vote results, the majority by a wide margin(even with some votes still out there) desire a rule be put in place. I suggest we now refine the two above rules and put it back up for a vote with only these two options.

_________________
Image

San Andreas Division Champions: 2005,2007,2015,2017,2018,2019,2020,2021,2028,2032,2035

2032 Western Conference Champions

2032 CFL Champions


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

All times are UTC-07:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited